Globalization is an overwhelming world trend. Supporters of anti-globalization see globalization as homogenization. Indeed, globalization isn’t just homogenization; despite what might be expected, it upgrades social personality. To start with, People are not simple objects of social impacts, but rather subjects who can dismiss or coordinate culture. Also, with the improvement of science and innovation, individuals are nearer than previously. The feeling of “harmony” carried with globalization isn’t at all in struggle with variety. In the new period of globalization, individuals become considerably more worried about the uniqueness and distinction of their own way of life. Social personality gives the worldwide meaning of nearby information and the ability to be self- aware, local area and country.

               As far as science, innovation and monetary turn of events, globalization reflects to some degree the hypothesis of intermingling and domineering control, in any case, in more profound sense, it advances social character. This paper attempts to clarify how globalization and social character can shape a productive collaboration. On the off chance that globalization is seen as far as harmony, the world is more diverse and more “together”.

               A culture is the way of life of a people through which they humanize and socialize nature. It implies a world-view, a value system, and a network of social relationships (Featherstone, 1996). Culture is changing. People make culture, culture makes people .Culture does change in dialogue with changing economic and socio-political circumstances. A culture changes with other cultures with which it is brought into contact through commercial or political relations. (Tomlinson, 1999). For instance, South Africa is multicultural, and the constitution mirrors this.

                 Essentially all over, from all sides, in law, governmental issues, in the press and from the public channels of correspondence, we realize that South Africa is made out of numerous societies, and that those societies are the item and properties of various individuals. However, this thought misshapes the idea of culture. This thought should be remedied to comprehend what culture is and what it does. Be that as it may, from an expansive perspective, a few qualities are created inside various societies. For model, during the 1950s, the South African Freedom Charter expressed immovably that various individuals of South Africa will be allowed to foster their own societies. One thing that culture did during politically-sanctioned racial segregation period was making the limits of class, nationality, race, sex, age, an area inside which we as a whole live. With respect to the idea of culture, multiculturalism or social variety I have set out that culture is the entire lifestyle of individuals, from birth to the grave, from morning to night, furthermore, in any event, during rest, has today gotten a clearly inescapable. (Appadurai, 1996).

                 In light of the way the surface of social variety is perceived and particularly the manner in which globalization impacts culture, without question culture is and will consistently be diverse yet equivalent. Each culture is significant and deserving of neutrality. In this sense this paper has expounded on the migration of social concentrates with expanding consideration being paid to the globalization of culture and basic practices concerning societies. Present day cultures are multicultural in themselves, incorporating a large number of changing lifestyles and ways of life of individuals homogenizing. (Waters, 2001).